Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants

Calaes, Ivana Leme deMotta, Marcos MatiasBasso, Rafael de CamposCalderoni, Davi ReisKharmandayan, Paulo

Purpose To evaluate whether silicone foam implants have a different evolution pattern compared to conventional texture implants. Methods Fifty-eight female patients underwent surgery. They were divided into two groups (silicone foam Lifesil® and microtexturized silicone Lifesil®). The evolution was analyzed in postoperative consultations, with physical examination, photographic documentation and filling in a satisfaction questionnaire, in the postoperative period of one month, four months, one year and then annually, up to a maximum of 3 years of follow-up. Results There were no statistically significant differences in presence of rippling, stretch marks, breast ptosis, capsular contracture and quality of scars. There was a higher rate of patients who were very satisfied with the outcome 360 days after surgery in the group receiving silicone foam implants (p = 0.036). Conclusion In short time, silicone foam envelope implants proved to be as reliable as textured silicone envelope implants, making them an option for augmentation mammoplasty.(AU)

1. Silicone elastomers
2. Breast implants
3. Mammaplasty
4. Prostheses and implants