Comparative study of Polypropylene versus Parietex composite®, Vicryl® and Ultrapro® meshes, regarding the formation of intraperitoneal adhesions

Biondo-Simões, Maria de Lourdes PessoleCarvalho, Laísa BrandãoConceição, Lucas TavaresSantos, Kassyane Bordignon Piccinelli dosSchiel, Wagner AugustoArantes, MayaraSilveira, Tatiane daMagri, Júlio CésarGomes, Fernanda Fabrini

Purpose: To compare the polypropylene mesh (Marlex®) to Vicryl®, Parietex composite® and Ultrapro® meshes to assess the occurrence of adhesions in the intraperitoneal implantation. Methods: Sixty Wistar rats were allocated into three groups: PP+V, in which all the animals received a polypropylene and a Vicryl® mesh; PP+PC, with the implantation of polypropylene and Parietex composite® meshes and PP+UP, in which there was implantation of polypropylene and Ultrapro®. Macroscopic analysis was performed 28 days later to assess the percentage of mesh area affected by adhesion. Results: in the PP+ V group, the Vicryl® mesh showed lower adhesion formation (p=0.013). In the PP+PC, there were no differences between polypropylene and Parietex composite® (p=0.765). In the PP+UP group, Ultrapro® and polypropylene meshes were equivalent (p=0.198) . Conclusion: All the four meshes led to adhesions, with the Vicryl® mesh showing the least potential for its formation.(AU)

1. Surgical Mesh
2. Tissue Adhesions
3. Hernia; ventral
4. Rats
5. Abdominal Wall
6. Peritoneum